Case study - flexibility

12 people participated in the survey. Here are the results.

Case Study
X is the person in charge of convening a meeting of owners of a condominium that wishes to appoint a sales committee for an enbloc sales. The law requires 30% of the owners to be present for the meeting to start at the "appointed time". At the time of the meeting, the quorum of the meeting was not met. However, some owners appeared with the next 15 minutes and the quorum was met. The law did not state whether the meeting cound be extended beyond the appointed time, but also did not state that any extension was disallowed. Should X allowed the meeting to start later, when the quorum was met? Give your views in this survey