I sent a letter addressed to:
Tan Kin Lian
Singapore 809744.
10 days have passed. It never arrived!
Singapore Post must have decided that this address is incomplete and thrown the letter away!
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Popular Posts
-
The taxi driver who drove me to the airport told me this story. 30 years ago, he wanted a life insurance policy that pays him at age 55. The...
-
COMMENT POSTED IN MY BLOG The extravagant splurging on ads and rebranding is going to make REVoSAVE the most expensive product ever launched...
-
This article explains the indisputability clause, and how consumers can be protected under this clause against unfair rejection of claims. A...
-
Taipei celebrates the New Year in style. At the stroke of midnight, fireworks are set off in many building in Taipei. The most spectacular i...
-
Published in Straits Times Online Forum: AFTER deregulation, the taxi service has become progressively worse over the years and there is muc...
-
I have already submitted the following logo to the Elections Dept for approval. I will only be informed of their decision only after nominat... -
Shaun Lee introduced the VBox from SingPost. Any body used this service before? What is your experience? Is it useful? http://www.vpost.com...
-
I SUPPORT the suggestion by Mr Christopher Jude Loh ('Viable alternative'; yesterday) to allow more buses to be deployed on a perman...
-
1. Singaporeans have the mindset that they must own their home. I wish to give some views on the need to change this mindset. 2. Owning a ho...
-
I refer to the letter from Gan Siok Bin, “Why do existing customers pay a higher 2nd-year rate?” (ST March 31) Gan Siok Bin took a floating ...
:.
0 comments:
Post a Comment