COMMENT POSTED IN MY BLOG
Despite the fact Mr Tan has repeatedly said he delivered products that give good value, he designed the Anticipation plan when there were better value products like Endowment around. Anticipation is Revosave's predecessor. Personally, I find this an irony. I hope Mr Tan do not take offence in me bringing up this blunt fact.
REPLY
Here are the facts.
1. The Anticipation plan was designed 25 years ago.
2. It pays a lower rate of commission compared to similar plans in the market
3. It offered an attractive return to the policyholder, more than 4% per annum
4. The return on Anticipation is similar to Endowment plan, as the payout is every 3 years.
I am not familiar with the Revosave plan. Some people said that it offers a poor return, which is much lower than the Endowment plan. It is also quite confusing to the customer. I would not have designed such a product, as it goes against my belief on what is good value for the customer.
In today's environment, it is better to invest in a low cost, diversified fund. The saving plan is more flexible. Read this FAQ:
http://www.tankinlian.com/faq/savings.html
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 comments:
Post a Comment