The collapse of Equitable Life in UK was quoted as the reason to restructure the bonus of Income. The consultant recommended that the annual bonus rate was too high and supported the restructure to a lower rate of annual bonus, to be compensated by a higher rate of terminal bonus.
Tan Yew Ming, a local actuary, studied the report on the collapse of Equitable Life. He found that the problem of Equitable Life was the high rate of terminal bonus promised to policyholders that were not reserved.
When the court decided that Equitable Life had to pay the terminal bonus, Equitable Life faced financial difficulties and had to cease transacting new business. This concluson was also reported by BBC in a commentary.
If Equitable Life had declared a higher rate of annual bonus, they are required to set aside reserve for the bonus. This would have given them a stronger financial position.
I hope that Income will study this matter carefully and avoid the risk faced by Equitable Life, i.e. promise high terminal bonus rates that are not funded.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
:.
0 comments:
Post a Comment