Comment posted in my blog (edited)
The whole idea of cash back is to confuse the consumers. Imagine the executive financial consultants cannot calculate and know little about this product, how do you expect the consumers to understand.
One social enterprise launched another product recently. These consumers will be in for a good ride when they find out that the projected return will not be delivered after 10 years. These consumers deserve it for trusting their agents. Don't know whether to pity the consumers or not.Consumers may think the cashbacks are interest earned. They are actually your own money returned to you as cash back. The agents are silent on this. The agents were trained not to mention anything until you ask. They tell the customers the points that 'sound' good and suppress the risk to the consumer.
My comment
The insurance agent compares the yield of these cash back product (around 1% per annum) with the low rate of interest on bank deposits. This comparison is wrong. Consumers should not lock their savings for 10 years or longer at the low yield. A fairer comparision is the yield on government bonds of the same duration, which should be more than 2% per annum. Furthermore, the government bonds are liquid and can be sold at a fair market price, without the heavy penalty that is found in a life insurance policy.
Learn about the "effect of deduction" from Practical Guide on Financial Planning.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 comments:
Post a Comment